Product Description

Aluminum Encoder Coupling Beam Coupling

 

Description of Aluminum Encoder Coupling Beam Coupling

1. One-piece metallic beam coupling
2. Zero backlash, flexible shaft
3. Spiral and parallel cut designs available
4. Accommodates misalignment and shaft endplay
5. Identical clockwise and counterclockwise rotation
6. Available in aluminum or stainless steel
7. Multiple bore and shaft connecting configurations
 

Parameter of Aluminum Encoder Coupling Beam Coupling

Model	D (mm)	L (mm)	d1-d2 (mm)	hex screw	L1 (mm)	L2 (mm)	L3 (mm)	Fasten Torque (n.m)
LR-D-D15L20	15	20	3.0-8.0	M3.	2.5	2	0.4	1.2
LR-D-D19L25	19	25	6.0-10.0	M3.	3	2	0.4	1.2
LR-D-D25L30	25	30	8.0-12.0	M4	4	2	0.4	2.5
LR-D-D30L35	30	35	8.0-18.0	M4	4	2.5	0.5	2.5
LR-D-D35L40	35	40	8.0-22.0	M5	5	2.5	0.5	5
LR-D-D40L45	40	45	10.0-28.0	M6	6	3.5	0.6	8

Model	Max bore (mm)	Rated Torque (n.m)	Max Torque (n.m)	Max speed (rpm)	Moment of Inertia (kg.m2)	Permissible Radial Deviation (degree)	Permissible Angular Deviation (degree)
LR-D-D15L20	8	0.5	1	30000	2.5*10-7	0.05	0.5
LR-D-D19L25	10	1	2	25000	5.8*10-7	0.05	0.5
LR-D-D25L30	12	1.5	3	18000	1.8*10-6	0.05	0.5
LR-D-D30L35	18	2	4	16000	4.7*10-6	0.05	0.5
LR-D-D35L40	22	3	6	14000	1.1*10-5	0.05	0.5
LR-D-D40L45	28	6	12	12000	2.3*10-5	0.05	0.5

Model	D (mm)	L (mm)	d1-d2 (mm)	Fasten Torque (n.m)
LT-D-D15L20	15	20	4.0-5.0	0.7
LT-D-D19L25	19	25	6.0-10.0	0.7
LT-D-D25L30	25	30	8.0-12.0	0.7
LT-D-D30L35	30	35	8.0-18.0	1.7
LT-D-D35L40	35	40	8.0-22.0	4
LT-D-D40L45	40	45	10.0-28.0	4

Model	Max bore (mm)	Rated Torque (n.m)	Max Torque (n.m)	Max speed (rpm)	Moment of Inertia (kg.m2)	Permissible Radial Deviation (degree)	Permissible Angular Deviation (degree)
LT-D-D15L20	5	0.5	1	30000	2.5*10-7	0.05	0.5
LT-D-D19L25	10	1	2	25000	5.8*10-7	0.05	0.5
LT-D-D25L30	12	1.5	3	18000	1.8*10-6	0.05	0.5
LT-D-D30L35	18	2	4	16000	4.7*10-6	0.05	0.5
LT-D-D35L40	22	3	6	14000	1.1*10-5	0.05	0.5
LT-D-D40L45	28	6	12	12000	2.3*10-5	0.05	0.5

 

/* January 22, 2571 19:08:37 */!function(){function s(e,r){var a,o={};try{e&&e.split(“,”).forEach(function(e,t){e&&(a=e.match(/(.*?):(.*)$/))&&1

View More

Comparison of Beam Couplings to Other Coupling Types in Terms of Backlash and Torsional Stiffness

When considering coupling options for motion control systems, two critical performance characteristics to evaluate are backlash and torsional stiffness. Backlash refers to the amount of rotational play or free movement between the connected shafts, while torsional stiffness indicates a coupling’s ability to resist torsional deformation when transmitting torque. Let’s compare beam couplings to other common coupling types in terms of these factors:

• Beam Couplings:

  Beam couplings generally exhibit low to minimal backlash due to their single or multiple helical beam design. The helical beams provide some flexibility to accommodate misalignment, but they maintain a relatively tight connection between the shafts, resulting in low backlash. This characteristic is especially valuable in precision motion control applications where eliminating play is essential for accurate positioning.

  In terms of torsional stiffness, beam couplings offer moderate to high values. The helical beams provide good torsional rigidity, making them suitable for applications that demand precise torque transmission and minimal torsional deflection. However, compared to other types like disc or jaw couplings, beam couplings may have slightly lower torsional stiffness.

• Disc Couplings:

  Disc couplings are known for their excellent torsional stiffness, providing robust torque transmission and minimal torsional deformation. They are ideal for applications requiring high precision and where torsional rigidity is critical.

  Regarding backlash, disc couplings typically have low to negligible values. Their design allows for precise and direct transmission of torque between the shafts, resulting in minimal rotational play.

• Jaw Couplings:

  Jaw couplings offer low to moderate torsional stiffness, making them suitable for applications with moderate torque requirements. They provide some flexibility to handle misalignment, but their torsional rigidity is not as high as disc couplings or certain types of beam couplings.

  Backlash in jaw couplings can vary depending on the specific design and materials. Some jaw couplings may have slightly more backlash compared to beam or disc couplings due to the elastomeric spider element used in their construction.

• Oldham Couplings:

  Oldham couplings offer low backlash performance due to their unique three-piece design, which incorporates two outer hubs and a middle disk. The design allows for consistent torque transmission and minimal play between the shafts.

  Torsional stiffness in Oldham couplings is moderate, providing a balance between flexibility and rigidity. While not as rigid as disc couplings, they still offer reliable torque transmission for various motion control applications.

In summary, beam couplings offer low to minimal backlash and moderate to high torsional stiffness, making them suitable for precision motion control applications that require a balance between flexibility and rigidity. Disc couplings provide excellent torsional stiffness and low backlash, making them an ideal choice for high-precision applications. Jaw couplings and Oldham couplings offer moderate performance in both backlash and torsional stiffness and are well-suited for applications with moderate torque and misalignment compensation requirements.

When selecting a coupling type, consider the specific needs of your application, such as the required precision, torque capacity, and misalignment compensation. Each coupling type has its advantages and limitations, and choosing the right one will contribute to the overall performance and reliability of your motion control system.

Beam Couplings for Specific Industries and Specialized Applications

Yes, there are beam couplings specifically designed to meet the unique requirements of various industries and specialized applications. Manufacturers offer a wide range of beam coupling options with different materials, designs, and features tailored to specific use cases. Here are some examples of beam couplings designed for specific industries and applications:

• Food and Beverage Industry:

  Beam couplings used in the food and beverage industry are typically made from stainless steel or food-grade materials to meet strict hygiene standards. These couplings are resistant to corrosion, easy to clean, and comply with FDA and USDA regulations. They are commonly found in conveyor systems, packaging equipment, and food processing machinery.

• Medical and Pharmaceutical Industry:

  Beam couplings used in medical and pharmaceutical applications are designed to meet stringent cleanliness and precision requirements. They are often made from materials like stainless steel or plastic, ensuring biocompatibility and resistance to sterilization processes. These couplings are used in medical robots, imaging equipment, and precision medical devices.

• Aerospace and Defense Industry:

  Beam couplings for aerospace and defense applications must withstand extreme environments, high accelerations, and vibrations. They are commonly made from lightweight yet strong materials like aluminum or high-performance alloys. These couplings are used in aircraft control systems, satellite components, and defense equipment.

• Robotics:

  Beam couplings used in robotics require high torsional stiffness and low inertia to optimize robotic performance. They are often made from materials like aluminum or carbon fiber. These couplings are used in robotic joints and end-effectors to achieve precise and rapid motion.

• Automotive Industry:

  Beam couplings in the automotive industry need to handle high torque loads and provide reliable power transmission. They are commonly made from steel or aluminum to balance strength and weight. These couplings are used in automotive steering systems, transmissions, and engine components.

• Renewable Energy:

  Beam couplings used in renewable energy applications, such as wind turbines and solar tracking systems, are designed to withstand harsh environmental conditions and provide precise motion control. They are often made from materials with good corrosion resistance. These couplings help optimize energy production and enhance system efficiency.

Additionally, there are beam couplings designed for specialized applications, such as vacuum environments, cleanrooms, or underwater operations. These couplings have specific features to address the challenges of their respective applications, ensuring reliable performance in their intended environments.

Manufacturers of beam couplings offer a wide selection of standard and custom designs to cater to the diverse needs of different industries and specialized applications. When choosing a beam coupling, it’s essential to consider the specific requirements of the application to ensure optimal performance and longevity.

Differences between Single-Beam and Multi-Beam Couplings

Single-beam and multi-beam couplings are two common types of beam couplings used in motion control applications. While they both provide flexibility for misalignment compensation, they have distinct differences in design and performance. Let’s explore these differences:

• Structure:

  A single-beam coupling consists of a single helical beam that connects the two shafts. It is a straightforward design with a single helix providing angular misalignment compensation. On the other hand, a multi-beam coupling has multiple helical beams arranged in parallel around the circumference of the coupling. The multiple beams increase its flexibility and enable compensation for angular, axial, and parallel misalignment.

• Misalignment Compensation:

  Both single-beam and multi-beam couplings are capable of compensating for misalignment between connected shafts. However, the level of compensation differs between the two types. Single-beam couplings are more suitable for applications with primarily angular misalignment. They can handle small amounts of axial and parallel misalignment but are less effective than multi-beam couplings in this regard. Multi-beam couplings, with their multiple beams, can efficiently accommodate more extensive misalignment in all three axes, making them suitable for applications with more complex misalignment requirements.

• Torsional Rigidity:

  Single-beam couplings typically have lower torsional rigidity compared to multi-beam couplings. This means that single-beam couplings may exhibit slightly more torsional flexibility and compliance under torque compared to their multi-beam counterparts. As a result, multi-beam couplings are often preferred in applications where high torsional rigidity is essential to maintain precise motion control and minimize backlash.

• Applications:

  The choice between single-beam and multi-beam couplings depends on the specific requirements of the application. Single-beam couplings are commonly used in applications where space is limited, and primarily angular misalignment needs to be compensated. They are suitable for less demanding misalignment scenarios and can be found in various motion control systems, including small automation machinery and robotics.

  Multi-beam couplings are chosen for applications that require more comprehensive misalignment compensation. They excel in situations where misalignment can occur in multiple axes and are often used in precision motion control systems, optical equipment, and applications with high torsional rigidity and accuracy requirements.

In summary, single-beam and multi-beam couplings both offer flexibility for misalignment compensation in motion control systems. Single-beam couplings are simple, space-efficient, and suitable for applications with primarily angular misalignment. On the other hand, multi-beam couplings provide enhanced misalignment compensation in all three axes and offer higher torsional rigidity, making them ideal for precision applications with more complex misalignment requirements.

editor by CX 2024-02-29